Richard stopped cooperating voluntarily.<\/p>\n
That was how Daniel phrased it.<\/p>\n
Not fled.<\/p>\n
Not confessed.<\/p>\n
Not guilty.<\/p>\n
Stopped cooperating voluntarily.<\/p>\n
His attorney informed investigators that future requests should proceed formally.<\/p>\n
I understood.<\/p>\n
If I were him, perhaps I would have done the same.<\/p>\n
That did not make me sympathetic.<\/p>\n
It made the next steps slower.<\/p>\n
The investigators had enough digital evidence to seek broader legal access to business devices and accounts.<\/p>\n
I was not told every procedural detail.<\/p>\n
That was probably healthy.<\/p>\n
For weeks, I had been living too close to the machinery.<\/p>\n
Every log.<\/p>\n
Every timestamp.<\/p>\n
Every file.<\/p>\n
At some point, evidence stops giving clarity and starts becoming oxygen you think you cannot live without.<\/p>\n
Evelyn noticed before I did.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou checked the title alert six times today.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid I?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI wanted to make sure nothing changed.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cIt emails you if something changes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI know.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSo why check?\u201d<\/p>\n
I did not answer.<\/p>\n
Because vigilance felt like safety.<\/p>\n
Because once people used silence against you, silence became suspicious.<\/p>\n
Because a quiet phone might mean peace or another hidden filing.<\/p>\n
Evelyn sat across from me.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou protected the house.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cLawyers are watching.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cPolice are investigating.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou can eat lunch.\u201d<\/p>\n
I looked at the sandwich I had forgotten.<\/p>\n
She was right.<\/p>\n
Trauma was beginning to imitate responsibility.<\/p>\n
If I stopped looking, something bad might happen.<\/p>\n
But I had spent years believing the same thing about Liam\u2019s problems.<\/p>\n
If I stopped helping, something bad might happen.<\/p>\n
Control wears many disguises.<\/p>\n
I ate the sandwich.<\/p>\n
At two, Liam called.<\/p>\n
He sounded nervous.<\/p>\n
\u201cMy lawyer says I can ask you something personal if you\u2019re comfortable.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat is an awkward introduction.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI know.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cCan I bring the kids Sunday?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cChloe wants to see them.\u201d<\/p>\n
I paused.<\/p>\n
\u201cAre they with you?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHas she asked through you?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat is between you, Chloe, and your lawyers.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI know.\u201d<\/p>\n
He hesitated.<\/p>\n
\u201cShe says I\u2019m using the case to keep them from her.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAre you?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThen let the appropriate people work it out.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI hate talking like this.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSo do I.\u201d<\/p>\n
We had once discussed dinner plans without counsel.<\/p>\n
Now every sentence had invisible edges.<\/p>\n
\u201cMom?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI heard you changed the estate plan.\u201d<\/p>\n
My body stiffened.<\/p>\n
\u201cFrom whom?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cChloe said Margaret filed something.\u201d<\/p>\n
Margaret had not publicly filed my will.<\/p>\n
Some revocations or notices might create records, but the contents were private.<\/p>\n
\u201cShe does not know my estate plan.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cOkay.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNeither do you.\u201d<\/p>\n
Silence.<\/p>\n
\u201cI wasn\u2019t asking.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou were close.\u201d<\/p>\n
He accepted that.<\/p>\n
\u201cFair.\u201d<\/p>\n
The old Liam might have pushed.<\/p>\n
What are you leaving the kids?<\/p>\n
Am I still trustee?<\/p>\n
Did you remove me?<\/p>\n
This Liam stopped.<\/p>\n
\u201cSunday at eleven?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
After we hung up, I called Margaret.<\/p>\n
\u201cDid anything reveal the new estate terms?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cCould Chloe know?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cShe could know documents changed. Not contents.\u201d<\/p>\n
Good.<\/p>\n
Privacy restored one small piece at a time.<\/p>\n
The next morning, Detective Ruiz and Chen met Daniel and me at his office.<\/p>\n
They had recovered material from an account connected to Richard\u2019s consulting company.<\/p>\n
The search had produced thousands of files.<\/p>\n
Most irrelevant.<\/p>\n
Invoices.<\/p>\n
Properties.<\/p>\n
Taxes.<\/p>\n
Contracts.<\/p>\n
But a folder named BENNETT PROJECT contained nearly everything related to us.<\/p>\n
Bennett Project.<\/p>\n
I hated the name more than I expected.<\/p>\n
Projects have objectives.<\/p>\n
Milestones.<\/p>\n
Deliverables.<\/p>\n
My family had become one.<\/p>\n
Ruiz opened a timeline document.<\/p>\n
Created July 3.<\/p>\n
Before the signature extraction.<\/p>\n
Before the home equity application.<\/p>\n
Before guardianship.<\/p>\n
The first entry:<\/p>\n
Objective: acquire Northbrook property using pooled family capital while preserving flexibility around Martha participation.<\/p>\n
Preserving flexibility.<\/p>\n
Meaning whether I agreed or not.<\/p>\n
The second:<\/p>\n
Constraint: M.B. unlikely to approve leverage against residence.<\/p>\n
They knew.<\/p>\n
Before asking.<\/p>\n
The third:<\/p>\n
Mitigation: indirect authority \/ future estate support \/ bridge structures.<\/p>\n
I read it twice.<\/p>\n
\u201cThis was July third.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes,\u201d Ruiz said.<\/p>\n
\u201cWho created it?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cRichard\u2019s user account.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAny edits from Chloe?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cLater.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBut original?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cRichard\u2019s account.\u201d<\/p>\n
That mattered.<\/p>\n
Architecture.<\/p>\n
Before Chloe\u2019s involvement deepened, Richard had already defined my refusal as a constraint requiring mitigation.<\/p>\n
Not a decision.<\/p>\n
A constraint.<\/p>\n
The document continued.<\/p>\n
Liam psychologically resistant to direct pressure on mother. Keep focus on children\/housing.<\/p>\n
My son mapped like a sales prospect.<\/p>\n
Chloe motivated but risk-sensitive. Needs plausible distance from technical execution.<\/p>\n
I felt cold.<\/p>\n
Even Chloe\u2019s eventual defense had been anticipated.<\/p>\n
Give her enough distance from technical execution.<\/p>\n
Not innocence.<\/p>\n
Distance.<\/p>\n
Susan not financially sophisticated; use sale proceeds but minimize details.<\/p>\n
I stopped.<\/p>\n
\u201cSusan.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
Richard had categorized his own wife.<\/p>\n
Useful capital.<\/p>\n
Minimal details.<\/p>\n
Everyone did what they were useful for.<\/p>\n
He had written the philosophy into the structure.<\/p>\n
\u201cAnd me?\u201d<\/p>\n
Ruiz scrolled.<\/p>\n
M.B. identity: emotionally attached to paid-off house, low debt tolerance, high family loyalty, conflict avoidance, likely to rescue Liam if consequences severe.<\/p>\n
I stared at the screen.<\/p>\n
They had described me accurately.<\/p>\n
That was the worst part.<\/p>\n
Not because my traits were flaws.<\/p>\n
Because Richard saw them as tools.<\/p>\n
My love for my son.<\/p>\n
My aversion to conflict.<\/p>\n
My pride in owning the house.<\/p>\n
My fear of debt.<\/p>\n
Every personal truth translated into strategy.<\/p>\n
Under approach:<\/p>\n
Avoid direct comprehensive request. Segment asks.<\/p>\n
Segment asks.<\/p>\n
One small favor at a time.<\/p>\n
One transfer.<\/p>\n
One signature.<\/p>\n
One explanation.<\/p>\n
Never show the whole structure.<\/p>\n
Chloe\u2019s July recording returned to me.<\/p>\n
She\u2019ll never sign if she sees the whole structure.<\/p>\n
Then we don\u2019t show her the whole structure.<\/p>\n
The strategy was documented before the conversation.<\/p>\n
Richard had not improvised that idea.<\/p>\n
He had planned it.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat does \u2018indirect authority\u2019 mean here?\u201d<\/p>\n
Chen scrolled farther.<\/p>\n
Potential pathways:<\/p>\n
Existing POA.<\/p>\n
Temporary guardianship.<\/p>\n
Limited transaction authorization.<\/p>\n
Trust conveyance.<\/p>\n
All before those actions occurred.<\/p>\n
Blueprint.<\/p>\n
\u201cThere\u2019s no question he planned these options,\u201d I said.<\/p>\n
Ruiz answered carefully.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe document supports that he considered them.\u201d<\/p>\n
I almost smiled.<\/p>\n
Police language was infuriating and stabilizing.<\/p>\n
They refused my emotional shortcuts.<\/p>\n
Good.<\/p>\n
The next document was an email Richard sent himself.<\/p>\n
Subject: MB signature.<\/p>\n
Body:<\/p>\n
Need clean source before formal package. Chloe likely has tax\/travel docs. Avoid asking Liam.<\/p>\n
Date: July 7.<\/p>\n
Two days before my signature was extracted.<\/p>\n
My throat tightened.<\/p>\n
That was stronger.<\/p>\n
He had asked himself for a clean source.<\/p>\n
Then Chloe\u2019s account produced one.<\/p>\n
\u201cIs there an email to Chloe?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
July 8.<\/p>\n
Richard:<\/p>\n
Need sample of Martha signature for comparative paperwork. Something recent and clean.<\/p>\n
Chloe:<\/p>\n
Why?<\/p>\n
Richard:<\/p>\n
Lender consistency.<\/p>\n
Chloe:<\/p>\n
That doesn\u2019t make sense.<\/p>\n
Richard:<\/p>\n
Just send travel form scan.<\/p>\n
The next day, my signature was extracted.<\/p>\n
Chloe had sent the form.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did she think it was for?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHer attorney says she believed Richard needed it to compare documents.\u201d<\/p>\n
I stared at Daniel.<\/p>\n
\u201cThat explanation is terrible.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cIt may be.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cShe questioned it.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAnd sent it anyway.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
Again.<\/p>\n
A line crossed through convenience.<\/p>\n
Ruiz showed me another file.<\/p>\n
Signature versions.<\/p>\n
Three images.<\/p>\n
My real signature from the travel form.<\/p>\n
Martha_alt1.<\/p>\n
Martha_alt2.<\/p>\n
Then master.<\/p>\n
Comments.<\/p>\n
R. Hale:<\/p>\n
Tail too short.<\/p>\n
Next:<\/p>\n
B doesn\u2019t match.<\/p>\n
Then:<\/p>\n
Use this one. Closest to original.<\/p>\n
No ambiguity.<\/p>\n
Richard had actively chosen among forged variants.<\/p>\n
\u201cWho created alt1 and alt2?\u201d<\/p>\n
Chen answered.<\/p>\n
\u201cOne generated under Richard\u2019s account, one under Chloe\u2019s profile.\u201d<\/p>\n
My chest tightened.<\/p>\n
\u201cSo Chloe made one.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cMetadata indicates the file was created while her account was active.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cCan you say she physically created it?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
Important.<\/p>\n
Could Richard have used her machine?<\/p>\n
Could account sync create misleading attribution?<\/p>\n
Digital evidence still required context.<\/p>\n
But the pattern was narrowing.<\/p>\n
Then came an email dated July 10.<\/p>\n
Richard to Chloe:<\/p>\n
Master is usable. Delete tests locally.<\/p>\n
Chloe:<\/p>\n
I don\u2019t want this on my computer.<\/p>\n
Richard:<\/p>\n
Then delete.<\/p>\n
Chloe:<\/p>\n
You said this was comparison.<\/p>\n
Richard:<\/p>\n
It is.<\/p>\n
Chloe:<\/p>\n
Comparison for what?<\/p>\n
No response.<\/p>\n
An hour later:<\/p>\n
Chloe:<\/p>\n
Dad?<\/p>\n
Richard:<\/p>\n
Stop messaging.<\/p>\n
She knew something was wrong.<\/p>\n
Then stopped pushing.<\/p>\n
Not enough.<\/p>\n
Never enough.<\/p>\n
The investigators had also found a document created July 29.<\/p>\n
Mock mortgage guarantee.<\/p>\n
My name.<\/p>\n
Property amount.<\/p>\n
No lender yet.<\/p>\n
Placeholder fields.<\/p>\n
My forged signature inserted.<\/p>\n
Richard\u2019s account.<\/p>\n
A rehearsal months before the real guarantee.<\/p>\n
Another mock document.<\/p>\n
Limited power of attorney.<\/p>\n
Again, placeholder.<\/p>\n
Again my signature.<\/p>\n
August 2.<\/p>\n
Trust conveyance draft.<\/p>\n
August 3.<\/p>\n
The future transactions had been modeled before they were needed.<\/p>\n
\u201cThis means the later documents weren\u2019t emergency fixes,\u201d I said.<\/p>\n
\u201cYes,\u201d Daniel said.<\/p>\n
\u201cThey were prepared routes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
That distinction mattered morally even if lawyers would use different terms.<\/p>\n
No one could claim one panicked evening led to a forged signature.<\/p>\n
The infrastructure existed for months.<\/p>\n
Then Ruiz showed me something I did not expect.<\/p>\n
A document titled EXIT OPTIONS.<\/p>\n
For whom?<\/p>\n
Not me.<\/p>\n
Richard.<\/p>\n
If plan challenged:<\/p>\n
1. Characterize Martha as confused \/ previously consenting.<\/p>\n
2. Emphasize Liam transfers as independent conduct.<\/p>\n
3. Attribute signature processing to Chloe administrative activity.<\/p>\n
4. Separate Richard from device-level execution.<\/p>\n
I read number three again.<\/p>\n
Attribute signature processing to Chloe.<\/p>\n
He had planned to blame her.<\/p>\n
Before any investigation.<\/p>\n
That explained Chloe\u2019s recordings.<\/p>\n
Maybe she sensed it.<\/p>\n
Maybe she feared him before she feared me.<\/p>\n
\u201cDid Chloe see this document?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo evidence yet.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat about Liam?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cRichard planned his defense before completing the fraud.\u201d<\/p>\n
Ruiz did not use fraud.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe document appears to contemplate allegations arising from the plan.\u201d<\/p>\n
Fine.<\/p>\n
The effect was the same.<\/p>\n
Then the final line:<\/p>\n
Maintain plausible advisory role only.<\/p>\n
Plausible.<\/p>\n
Not real.<\/p>\n
Plausible.<\/p>\n
Richard understood distance.<\/p>\n
He had engineered his own.<\/p>\n
No wonder he used businesses.<\/p>\n
Couriers.<\/p>\n
Notaries.<\/p>\n
Chloe\u2019s account.<\/p>\n
Liam\u2019s signatures.<\/p>\n
My credentials.<\/p>\n
He wanted the benefits of control without direct fingerprints.<\/p>\n
Except he had left them anyway.<\/p>\n
Comments.<\/p>\n
Emails.<\/p>\n
File creation.<\/p>\n
Courier account.<\/p>\n
Planning documents.<\/p>\n
The arrogance of a person who believes planning makes him safer than everyone else.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat happens now?\u201d I asked.<\/p>\n
Ruiz gave the same answer I was learning to respect.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe investigation continues.\u201d<\/p>\n
No promise of arrest.<\/p>\n
No dramatic justice.<\/p>\n
No movie ending.<\/p>\n
Evidence.<\/p>\n
Procedure.<\/p>\n
Time.<\/p>\n
Then Chen turned to another issue.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe recovered records concerning the renewed guardianship strategy.\u201d<\/p>\n
I stiffened.<\/p>\n
\u201cFrom Richard?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
After Christmas, he had edited a document with proposed affidavits for Chloe, Susan, and Liam.<\/p>\n
Three family members describing my supposed decline.<\/p>\n
Susan had never agreed.<\/p>\n
Liam had not.<\/p>\n
Chloe had contributed comments to hers.<\/p>\n
That mattered.<\/p>\n
Her version included:<\/p>\n
Martha\u2019s unexpected Colorado travel shows impulsivity and inability to regulate conflict.<\/p>\n
Changing locks demonstrates paranoia.<\/p>\n
Hiring attorneys indicates susceptibility to outside influence.<\/p>\n
I stared at the page.<\/p>\n
\u201cHiring attorneys.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
A person fighting exploitation could be described as exploited.<\/p>\n
Perfect circularity.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did Richard add?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSuggested examples.\u201d<\/p>\n
My repeated stories.<\/p>\n
Forgotten appointments.<\/p>\n
Refusal to discuss finances.<\/p>\n
Suspicion of family.<\/p>\n
Then a chilling note:<\/p>\n
Need physician willing to recommend short inpatient evaluation if behavior escalates.<\/p>\n
Evelyn swore.<\/p>\n
I felt almost nothing.<\/p>\n
Maybe my body had reached its limit.<\/p>\n
\u201cDid he find one?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo evidence.\u201d<\/p>\n
Good.<\/p>\n
\u201cCould they have forced me into a hospital?\u201d<\/p>\n
Daniel answered carefully.<\/p>\n
\u201cNot merely because family requested it. There are legal and medical standards.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI know.\u201d<\/p>\n
I did now.<\/p>\n
But their willingness mattered.<\/p>\n
Richard was still looking for authority after exposure.<\/p>\n
Not because he expected the house transaction to survive.<\/p>\n
Maybe because if I were discredited, his earlier actions could be reframed.<\/p>\n
A confused woman.<\/p>\n
A family trying to help.<\/p>\n
A son borrowing with informal permission.<\/p>\n
Documents reflecting forgotten agreements.<\/p>\n
Their defense required making me unreliable.<\/p>\n
That strategy was not about controlling my future anymore.<\/p>\n
It was about controlling the story of the past.<\/p>\n
At home that afternoon, I walked into the basement.<\/p>\n
For the first time, I began separating belongings.<\/p>\n
Children\u2019s things.<\/p>\n
Liam\u2019s.<\/p>\n
Chloe\u2019s.<\/p>\n
Mine.<\/p>\n
Not throwing anything away.<\/p>\n
Just defining ownership.<\/p>\n
The act felt strangely intimate.<\/p>\n
A sweater Liam had left.<\/p>\n
Chloe\u2019s coffee mug.<\/p>\n
Emma\u2019s art supplies.<\/p>\n
Three years of shared life becoming labeled boxes.<\/p>\n
I hated it.<\/p>\n
But clarity requires sorting.<\/p>\n
Near the back of a closet, I found a framed family photograph.<\/p>\n
Last Christmas.<\/p>\n
All of us.<\/p>\n
Richard beside Susan.<\/p>\n
Chloe beside Liam.<\/p>\n
Children in front.<\/p>\n
Me in the middle.<\/p>\n
Everyone smiling.<\/p>\n
I sat on the floor holding it.<\/p>\n
The photograph was real.<\/p>\n
That day had happened.<\/p>\n
Maybe Richard was already thinking about money then.<\/p>\n
Maybe not.<\/p>\n
Maybe Chloe already resented me.<\/p>\n
Maybe.<\/p>\n
But Emma\u2019s smile was real.<\/p>\n
Liam\u2019s arm around my shoulder was real.<\/p>\n
My happiness was real.<\/p>\n
Evidence could expose deception without rewriting every moment before it.<\/p>\n
I needed that.<\/p>\n
Otherwise Richard would succeed at taking more than money.<\/p>\n
He would take my history.<\/p>\n
I put the photograph in my box.<\/p>\n
Upstairs, my phone rang.<\/p>\n
Susan.<\/p>\n
Her voice shook.<\/p>\n
\u201cI got papers.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat papers?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cInvestigators want an interview.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cTalk to your lawyer.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI am.\u201d<\/p>\n
She hesitated.<\/p>\n
\u201cMartha?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI found something else.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cA voicemail Richard left me in July.\u201d<\/p>\n
My pulse increased.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy is it still there?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI save everything.\u201d<\/p>\n
Of course she did.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat does he say?\u201d<\/p>\n
She played it.<\/p>\n
Richard\u2019s voice:<\/p>\n
Susan, don\u2019t mention the Martha paperwork to Liam. Chloe is nervous enough and he\u2019ll run to his mother. We\u2019re just getting preliminary numbers. Nothing is happening without approval.<\/p>\n
Nothing is happening without approval.<\/p>\n
July.<\/p>\n
The same week signature templates were being built.<\/p>\n
The same week mock documents appeared.<\/p>\n
The lie was already active.<\/p>\n
Not only toward me.<\/p>\n
Toward Susan.<\/p>\n
Toward Liam.<\/p>\n
Maybe toward Chloe in degrees.<\/p>\n
Richard had kept everyone in separate rooms even while they lived in the same family.<\/p>\n
That was his real structure.<\/p>\n
Compartmentalization.<\/p>\n
Different truth for each person.<\/p>\n
And at the center, he alone knew how the pieces connected.<\/p>\n
Except now investigators did too.<\/p>\n
Richard stopped cooperating voluntarily. That was how Daniel phrased it. Not fled. Not confessed. Not guilty. Stopped cooperating voluntarily. His attorney informed investigators that future requests should proceed formally. I … <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":10187,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10209","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-feel-one-story"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/feelonestory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10209","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/feelonestory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/feelonestory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/feelonestory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/feelonestory.online\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=10209"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/feelonestory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10209\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10252,"href":"https:\/\/feelonestory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10209\/revisions\/10252"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/feelonestory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/10187"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/feelonestory.online\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=10209"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/feelonestory.online\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=10209"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/feelonestory.online\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=10209"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}