The other family found us through lawyers.<\/p>\n
Not social media.<\/p>\n
Not news.<\/p>\n
Daniel received a call from an attorney representing a woman named Patricia Moore.<\/p>\n
I had never heard of her.<\/p>\n
Neither had Liam.<\/p>\n
Susan knew the surname.<\/p>\n
That was enough to make my stomach tighten.<\/p>\n
Patricia was Richard\u2019s cousin.<\/p>\n
Her father\u2014Richard\u2019s uncle\u2014had died three years earlier.<\/p>\n
He left a small commercial building and substantial retirement assets.<\/p>\n
Patricia\u2019s attorney believed documents in her father\u2019s estate might relate to the methods investigators were examining in my case.<\/p>\n
\u201cMethods,\u201d I said.<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNot my money.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSomeone else.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cPossibly.\u201d<\/p>\n
I felt something I did not expect.<\/p>\n
Relief.<\/p>\n
Then shame for feeling it.<\/p>\n
If Richard had done similar things before, it meant I had not uniquely failed to see him.<\/p>\n
But it also meant someone else may have been harmed.<\/p>\n
Relief at not being alone is morally messy.<\/p>\n
Daniel understood.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou don\u2019t have to make your feelings tidy.\u201d<\/p>\n
Good.<\/p>\n
Patricia agreed to meet me only after both attorneys approved.<\/p>\n
She was fifty-two, practical, with short dark hair and an expression that made me think she had run out of patience years ago.<\/p>\n
We met in Daniel\u2019s conference room.<\/p>\n
Her first sentence was:<\/p>\n
\u201cI think Richard practiced on my father.\u201d<\/p>\n
My chest tightened.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat happened?\u201d<\/p>\n
Her father, Gerald, developed Parkinson\u2019s late in life but remained mentally competent for years.<\/p>\n
Richard helped him manage a commercial property.<\/p>\n
Taxes.<\/p>\n
Tenants.<\/p>\n
Repairs.<\/p>\n
Family favor.<\/p>\n
Gradually, Richard took over more paperwork.<\/p>\n
Patricia lived in another state.<\/p>\n
She trusted him.<\/p>\n
After Gerald died, she discovered several loans secured against the building.<\/p>\n
\u201cWere they authorized?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSome.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNot all?\u201d<\/p>\n
She shook her head.<\/p>\n
\u201cOne had Dad\u2019s signature on a modification agreement dated when he was hospitalized.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cCould he have signed there?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes. That was the problem.\u201d<\/p>\n
Ambiguity.<\/p>\n
Maybe.<\/p>\n
Perhaps.<\/p>\n
Family said yes.<\/p>\n
Patricia could not prove otherwise.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe signature looked wrong?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNot obviously.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNotarized?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
My stomach tightened.<\/p>\n
\u201cWho?\u201d<\/p>\n
She slid over a copy.<\/p>\n
Sharon Pike.<\/p>\n
I stared.<\/p>\n
Same notary.<\/p>\n
\u201cDid Sharon remember?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cShe said Richard brought the papers and told her Dad had signed.\u201d<\/p>\n
The same method.<\/p>\n
Years earlier.<\/p>\n
\u201cDid you challenge it?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat happened?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWe settled with the lender.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHow much?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cToo much.\u201d<\/p>\n
Her jaw tightened.<\/p>\n
\u201cAnd Richard?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe said Dad wanted the money for property repairs.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid he?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSome repairs happened.\u201d<\/p>\n
Of course.<\/p>\n
The best frauds contain legitimate expenses.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat makes you think it relates now?\u201d<\/p>\n
Patricia\u2019s attorney produced an old USB drive found among Gerald\u2019s property records.<\/p>\n
Richard had created spreadsheets.<\/p>\n
Authority options.<\/p>\n
Cash flow.<\/p>\n
Estate.<\/p>\n
The vocabulary was familiar enough to make my skin crawl.<\/p>\n
One note:<\/p>\n
Gerald resistant to refinance. Patricia remote. Sharon can handle signature acknowledgment if execution timing difficult.<\/p>\n
Same patterns.<\/p>\n
Resistance.<\/p>\n
Distance.<\/p>\n
Signature handling.<\/p>\n
Another:<\/p>\n
If Gerald capacity declines, POA route cleaner.<\/p>\n
I closed my eyes.<\/p>\n
\u201cDid he have power of attorney?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cRichard?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWas it active?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cEventually.\u201d<\/p>\n
This was how experience developed.<\/p>\n
Not necessarily a crime the first time.<\/p>\n
Maybe blurred boundaries.<\/p>\n
Maybe aggressive paperwork.<\/p>\n
Maybe unauthorized modifications.<\/p>\n
Then techniques refined.<\/p>\n
\u201cDid Richard get money?\u201d<\/p>\n
Patricia nodded.<\/p>\n
\u201cA consulting fee.\u201d<\/p>\n
Of course.<\/p>\n
\u201cHow much?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThirty thousand.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cFrom loan proceeds?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
Northbridge before Northbridge.<\/p>\n
A family asset transaction paying Richard for structuring.<\/p>\n
\u201cDid your father know?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWe don\u2019t know.\u201d<\/p>\n
Again.<\/p>\n
The phrase that protects every hidden act until someone finds records.<\/p>\n
Patricia\u2019s eyes filled.<\/p>\n
\u201cI spent years thinking maybe Dad forgot telling me.\u201d<\/p>\n
My throat tightened.<\/p>\n
There it was.<\/p>\n
The psychological injury.<\/p>\n
Not merely money.<\/p>\n
Doubt.<\/p>\n
\u201cRichard said that?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe said Dad had become inconsistent.\u201d<\/p>\n
Same capacity narrative.<\/p>\n
Same defense.<\/p>\n
\u201cWas your father diagnosed with cognitive impairment?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cLate, yes.\u201d<\/p>\n
That made the situation harder.<\/p>\n
Richard had real decline to point to.<\/p>\n
Some transactions may have been proper.<\/p>\n
Some not.<\/p>\n
Truth buried inside legitimate caregiving.<\/p>\n
\u201cHow did it end?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDad died. Loans got paid when we sold the building.\u201d<\/p>\n
Convenient.<\/p>\n
No court battle over ownership.<\/p>\n
No living victim insisting they never agreed.<\/p>\n
Inheritance absorbed the damage.<\/p>\n
Richard\u2019s expectation may have been reinforced.<\/p>\n
Eventually assets settle.<\/p>\n
Eventually family stops fighting.<\/p>\n
Eventually death makes consent questions irrelevant.<\/p>\n
I felt cold.<\/p>\n
\u201cDid you report him?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy?\u201d<\/p>\n
Patricia looked straight at me.<\/p>\n
\u201cBecause my mother begged me not to destroy the family.\u201d<\/p>\n
There it was.<\/p>\n
Richard\u2019s oldest protection.<\/p>\n
Family.<\/p>\n
\u201cHe knew?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat she would?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe said so.\u201d<\/p>\n
She pulled out an email.<\/p>\n
Richard to Patricia after she threatened litigation:<\/p>\n
Think carefully about what accusing family publicly will do to your mother after losing Dad. Money can be fixed. Family reputation cannot.<\/p>\n
Pressure.<\/p>\n
Emotional.<\/p>\n
Targeted.<\/p>\n
Patricia backed down.<\/p>\n
Settled.<\/p>\n
Paid.<\/p>\n
Moved on.<\/p>\n
Or tried to.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhen did you learn about me?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cInvestigators contacted people connected to Sharon.\u201d<\/p>\n
That made sense.<\/p>\n
Patterns grow from shared professionals.<\/p>\n
Sharon\u2019s cooperation may have opened older files.<\/p>\n
Patricia looked at me.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou reported.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI wish I had.\u201d<\/p>\n
No accusation.<\/p>\n
Still, guilt rose.<\/p>\n
\u201cIf you had, maybe\u2014\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
She cut me off.<\/p>\n
\u201cThat is exactly what I spent three years doing.\u201d<\/p>\n
She leaned forward.<\/p>\n
\u201cIf I had fought harder. If I had called police. If I had ignored my mother. If I had checked Dad\u2019s accounts sooner.\u201d<\/p>\n
Her voice softened.<\/p>\n
\u201cDon\u2019t borrow my regrets and make them yours.\u201d<\/p>\n
I stared at her.<\/p>\n
That sentence stayed.<\/p>\n
Do not borrow my regrets.<\/p>\n
Families had borrowed enough from me.<\/p>\n
I did not need to borrow guilt too.<\/p>\n
Patricia\u2019s documents went to investigators.<\/p>\n
Patterns did not prove my case by themselves.<\/p>\n
Daniel reminded me.<\/p>\n
Prior conduct has evidentiary rules.<\/p>\n
Different facts.<\/p>\n
Different people.<\/p>\n
Do not assume.<\/p>\n
But investigative relevance was obvious.<\/p>\n
Richard had used similar language.<\/p>\n
Same notary.<\/p>\n
Same pre-signed paperwork.<\/p>\n
Same capacity route.<\/p>\n
Same consulting fee.<\/p>\n
Same family-pressure response when challenged.<\/p>\n
That afternoon, Susan called.<\/p>\n
She had spoken with Patricia.<\/p>\n
They knew each other.<\/p>\n
Barely.<\/p>\n
Family holidays years ago.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou knew about Gerald?\u201d I asked.<\/p>\n
\u201cI knew there was an argument.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did Richard tell you?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat Patricia was greedy.\u201d<\/p>\n
Of course.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat else?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat she was attacking him because she expected more inheritance.\u201d<\/p>\n
The challenger becomes unreliable.<\/p>\n
Greedy.<\/p>\n
Confused.<\/p>\n
Manipulated.<\/p>\n
Paranoid.<\/p>\n
There was always a character story ready for anyone who disputed paperwork.<\/p>\n
\u201cDid you believe him?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe was my husband.\u201d<\/p>\n
Thirty-seven years.<\/p>\n
Trust creates its own evidentiary standard.<\/p>\n
A spouse says something often enough, and verification feels disloyal.<\/p>\n
\u201cI told Patricia once to stop hurting the family,\u201d Susan whispered.<\/p>\n
I closed my eyes.<\/p>\n
\u201cDid you apologize?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cToday.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHow did she respond?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cShe said she needed time.\u201d<\/p>\n
Good.<\/p>\n
Time was allowed.<\/p>\n
Not every apology earns immediate relief.<\/p>\n
Susan cried quietly.<\/p>\n
\u201cI keep finding places where I helped him without knowing.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI know.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDoes not knowing matter?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cEnough?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat depends on what you knew when.\u201d<\/p>\n
The same standard I used for Liam.<\/p>\n
For Chloe.<\/p>\n
For myself.<\/p>\n
Knowledge changes responsibility.<\/p>\n
Susan had photographed documents.<\/p>\n
Signed forms.<\/p>\n
Accepted my supposed agreements.<\/p>\n
But evidence increasingly showed Richard kept her away from core fraud.<\/p>\n
She still had choices.<\/p>\n
Different ones.<\/p>\n
That distinction mattered.<\/p>\n
The next development involved Sharon.<\/p>\n
Her attorney arranged a formal cooperation interview.<\/p>\n
She admitted the Gerald notarization had been improper too.<\/p>\n
Years earlier.<\/p>\n
Richard told her Gerald signed at home.<\/p>\n
She notarized without seeing him.<\/p>\n
Why?<\/p>\n
\u201cBecause I trusted Richard.\u201d<\/p>\n
Same sentence.<\/p>\n
Different mouth.<\/p>\n
She admitted doing similar things \u201ca handful\u201d of times for his businesses and family transactions.<\/p>\n
Not necessarily forged signatures.<\/p>\n
But acknowledgments without proper appearance.<\/p>\n
Convenience.<\/p>\n
A small professional shortcut that created a perfect tool for someone like Richard.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat happens to her?\u201d I asked Daniel.<\/p>\n
\u201cLikely consequences.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cLicense?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cCommission, certainly at risk. Other legal consequences depend on findings.\u201d<\/p>\n
I felt no pleasure.<\/p>\n
Sharon had helped harm me.<\/p>\n
She had also come forward.<\/p>\n
Both true.<\/p>\n
Systems become corrupt not only through masterminds.<\/p>\n
They need people willing to shave rules because someone familiar asks.<\/p>\n
I had done that in my own way.<\/p>\n
Not notarizing fraud.<\/p>\n
But bypassing boundaries.<\/p>\n
Account access.<\/p>\n
Passwords.<\/p>\n
Money.<\/p>\n
\u201cFamily exception,\u201d I said.<\/p>\n
Daniel looked at me.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat\u2019s what everyone did. Rules existed until family asked.\u201d<\/p>\n
He nodded.<\/p>\n
\u201cThat\u2019s one way to describe it.\u201d<\/p>\n
The next morning, Liam visited with paperwork showing the truck had sold.<\/p>\n
He looked miserable.<\/p>\n
\u201cHow much did you get?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cLess than I owed.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat happens to the difference?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI\u2019m paying it.\u201d<\/p>\n
No request.<\/p>\n
Good.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat are you driving?\u201d<\/p>\n
He pointed out the window.<\/p>\n
A twelve-year-old silver sedan.<\/p>\n
I smiled.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou hate silver.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI hate the car.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cGood.\u201d<\/p>\n
He laughed.<\/p>\n
It felt almost normal.<\/p>\n
Then he became serious.<\/p>\n
\u201cMy lawyer told me about the other family.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cPatricia?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat do you think?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI think I should have seen Richard.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou met him through Chloe.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI mean seen him.\u201d<\/p>\n
Understood.<\/p>\n
\u201cPeople look clearer after evidence.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI trusted him because he talked like he knew everything.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cConfidence is persuasive.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSo is shame.\u201d<\/p>\n
I looked at him.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat do you mean?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe knew I was ashamed of living here.\u201d<\/p>\n
Yes.<\/p>\n
\u201cAnd every plan he offered sounded like a way to stop feeling ashamed.\u201d<\/p>\n
That was important.<\/p>\n
Richard didn\u2019t only offer money.<\/p>\n
He offered emotional relief.<\/p>\n
Independence.<\/p>\n
Status.<\/p>\n
A house.<\/p>\n
A way for Liam to stop feeling like a failed adult.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat should you have done?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAccepted what we could actually afford.\u201d<\/p>\n
Simple.<\/p>\n
Painful.<\/p>\n
\u201cMaybe rented.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cMaybe bought smaller.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cMaybe stayed longer but paid rent.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
He smiled sadly.<\/p>\n
\u201cAnything except pretending math was insulting us personally.\u201d<\/p>\n
I laughed.<\/p>\n
\u201cThat sounds like something Robert would say.\u201d<\/p>\n
Liam\u2019s face softened.<\/p>\n
\u201cDad would have hated this.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWould he hate me?\u201d<\/p>\n
The question cut deeper than anything financial.<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
I answered immediately.<\/p>\n
\u201cWould he be angry?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDisappointed?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
Liam nodded.<\/p>\n
He needed truth, not comfort.<\/p>\n
Then he said, \u201cI keep thinking if he were alive, none of this would happen.\u201d<\/p>\n
Maybe.<\/p>\n
Robert was skeptical.<\/p>\n
Protective.<\/p>\n
Harder to persuade.<\/p>\n
But rewriting reality around the dead is another form of fantasy.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe don\u2019t know.\u201d<\/p>\n
Liam looked at me.<\/p>\n
\u201cThat\u2019s fair.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe might have stopped Richard.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cProbably.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe might have stopped you too.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDefinitely.\u201d<\/p>\n
We both smiled.<\/p>\n
Then tears came.<\/p>\n
For both of us.<\/p>\n
Loss made strange appearances.<\/p>\n
Robert had been gone years.<\/p>\n
Yet this crisis kept reopening the space where his judgment used to exist.<\/p>\n
Not because I needed a man to protect me.<\/p>\n
Because marriage had meant another person shared the responsibility of suspicion.<\/p>\n
After he died, I became the only gatekeeper.<\/p>\n
Then I opened too many gates because keeping family close felt safer than saying no.<\/p>\n
That was my history.<\/p>\n
Not blame.<\/p>\n
History.<\/p>\n
The police case expanded after Patricia\u2019s documents.<\/p>\n
Investigators began examining other Richard transactions.<\/p>\n
I did not ask for names.<\/p>\n
Enough.<\/p>\n
My goal was no longer uncovering every bad thing he may have done.<\/p>\n
That was law enforcement\u2019s job.<\/p>\n
My life needed space beyond evidence.<\/p>\n
I joined Evelyn for lunch without discussing Richard for almost an hour.<\/p>\n
We talked about books.<\/p>\n
A neighbor\u2019s ridiculous new porch sculpture.<\/p>\n
Whether my kitchen needed painting.<\/p>\n
Normal things.<\/p>\n
Then she said, \u201cPaint it.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat color?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI don\u2019t know.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou brought it up.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI meant paint the room because you keep staring at the walls like they\u2019re evidence.\u201d<\/p>\n
I laughed.<\/p>\n
Maybe she was right.<\/p>\n
The kitchen had been the setting for too much.<\/p>\n
Richard at the table.<\/p>\n
Chloe scanning papers.<\/p>\n
Liam signing pages.<\/p>\n
The crumpled Christmas note.<\/p>\n
The forged documents spread across counters.<\/p>\n
I did not need to move.<\/p>\n
But perhaps the house could change with me.<\/p>\n
Not because someone scheduled my downsizing.<\/p>\n
Because I chose paint.<\/p>\n
Choice again.<\/p>\n
That evening, I found an old photograph of Robert painting the same kitchen.<\/p>\n
He had gotten white paint in his hair.<\/p>\n
I smiled.<\/p>\n
Then booked a contractor.<\/p>\n
I could afford it.<\/p>\n
My money.<\/p>\n
My house.<\/p>\n
My decision.<\/p>\n
Small.<\/p>\n
Immense.<\/p>\n
Before bed, Daniel called.<\/p>\n
Patricia\u2019s old case had produced one more connection.<\/p>\n
The lawyer who prepared one of Gerald\u2019s disputed loan modifications was not Douglas Crane.<\/p>\n
Not Martin Keene.<\/p>\n
A different lawyer.<\/p>\n
But the document courier who submitted it was the same service Richard later used for my rejected quitclaim deed.<\/p>\n
I closed my eyes.<\/p>\n
Years apart.<\/p>\n
Same infrastructure.<\/p>\n
Richard had not invented the December method under pressure.<\/p>\n
He had a network of habits.<\/p>\n
A way of doing things.<\/p>\n
Pre-signed pages.<\/p>\n
Remote acknowledgments.<\/p>\n
Couriers.<\/p>\n
Family intermediaries.<\/p>\n
Capacity stories.<\/p>\n
Private settlement when challenged.<\/p>\n
My case was not a sudden fall.<\/p>\n
It was a mature system finally exposed by too many contradictions at once.<\/p>\n
And perhaps by one difference.<\/p>\n
This time, the woman whose name was being used was still alive, alert, angry, and willing to say no in public.<\/p>\n
The other family found us through lawyers. Not social media. Not news. Daniel received a call from an attorney representing a woman named Patricia Moore. I had never heard of … <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":10187,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10218","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-feel-one-story"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/feelonestory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10218","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/feelonestory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/feelonestory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/feelonestory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/feelonestory.online\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=10218"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/feelonestory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10218\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10261,"href":"https:\/\/feelonestory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10218\/revisions\/10261"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/feelonestory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/10187"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/feelonestory.online\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=10218"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/feelonestory.online\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=10218"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/feelonestory.online\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=10218"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}