Marianne Holt did not deny it when Lena arrived.<\/p>\n
The former federal prosecutor stood behind her office desk with both hands resting on the wood.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou found the hospital report.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI wondered when.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy didn\u2019t you tell us?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBecause my history was not evidence in Rachel\u2019s case.\u201d<\/p>\n
Lena closed the office door.<\/p>\n
\u201cIt may be.\u201d<\/p>\n
Marianne gestured toward a chair.<\/p>\n
\u201cThen ask.\u201d<\/p>\n
Twenty-one years earlier, Marianne had been twenty-six and finishing law school.<\/p>\n
Pregnant.<\/p>\n
Unmarried.<\/p>\n
Her family lived across the country.<\/p>\n
She developed complications during the final month.<\/p>\n
A physician referred her to the same hospital system where Sarah and Allison would later be targeted.<\/p>\n
St. Agnes intake records had marked her:<\/p>\n
Limited local support.<\/p>\n
Professional instability due to student status.<\/p>\n
Unmarried.<\/p>\n
Potential adoption candidate.<\/p>\n
Marianne saw the copy now.<\/p>\n
Her mouth tightened.<\/p>\n
\u201cI never agreed to adoption.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWe know.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cGood.\u201d<\/p>\n
Her labor became complicated.<\/p>\n
The baby was born alive.<\/p>\n
Healthy.<\/p>\n
Then a nurse told Marianne the infant needed observation.<\/p>\n
They took him away.<\/p>\n
Hours passed.<\/p>\n
Nobody brought him back.<\/p>\n
Marianne became suspicious.<\/p>\n
She demanded records.<\/p>\n
Staff delayed.<\/p>\n
She tried to leave her bed.<\/p>\n
A physician warned that she was medically unstable.<\/p>\n
Marianne called police from the room phone.<\/p>\n
That saved her child.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat happened?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAn officer showed up who didn\u2019t know who Stephen was.\u201d<\/p>\n
Lena understood.<\/p>\n
An ordinary officer.<\/p>\n
Outside the network.<\/p>\n
\u201cHe insisted on seeing the baby.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
The infant was discovered in a transfer area under a temporary alias.<\/p>\n
\u201cWho was involved?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHalden.\u201d<\/p>\n
Richard Halden.<\/p>\n
The old obstetrician from Lark Recovery.<\/p>\n
\u201cStephen?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI didn\u2019t know his name then.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cMatthew?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cMorris?\u201d<\/p>\n
Marianne thought.<\/p>\n
\u201cA younger doctor was there. Could have been him.\u201d<\/p>\n
Henry Morris.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat happened afterward?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHospital called it administrative error.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid you believe that?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid police investigate?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBriefly.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWho closed it?\u201d<\/p>\n
Marianne looked at Lena.<\/p>\n
\u201cHarold Shaw.\u201d<\/p>\n
Of course.<\/p>\n
The compromised captain had been junior then but already inside the system.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did he say?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat no criminal intent could be established.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYour child?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cReturned to me.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhere is he now?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAlive. Married. Has no interest in this case.\u201d<\/p>\n
Choice again.<\/p>\n
Lena did not ask his name.<\/p>\n
\u201cDid you ever investigate privately?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cFor years.\u201d<\/p>\n
Marianne became a prosecutor partly because of what happened.<\/p>\n
She traced St. Agnes.<\/p>\n
Found inconsistent neonatal records.<\/p>\n
Found rumors of falsified infant deaths.<\/p>\n
But every lead ended.<\/p>\n
Records disappeared.<\/p>\n
Witnesses changed stories.<\/p>\n
Institutions closed.<\/p>\n
Stephen\u2019s network was younger then but already good at creating ambiguity.<\/p>\n
\u201cDid you know Sarah?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cRachel?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNot until she contacted me.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHow did she find you?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAn old sealed complaint.\u201d<\/p>\n
Rachel had been searching hospital discrepancies related to Rebecca and Lark.<\/p>\n
She discovered Marianne\u2019s twenty-one-year-old complaint.<\/p>\n
Reached out.<\/p>\n
Marianne believed her immediately because Rachel described methods she recognized.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou knew Lark was real.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI knew something was.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy not go public?\u201d<\/p>\n
Marianne looked almost offended.<\/p>\n
\u201cWith what? A story from two decades ago and a nurse carrying copied spreadsheets?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou were a federal prosecutor.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhich means I knew exactly how badly unsupported accusations can fail.\u201d<\/p>\n
That was fair.<\/p>\n
\u201cAnd if we failed publicly, Stephen would know exactly what we had.\u201d<\/p>\n
So they built the dead-drop plan.<\/p>\n
Rachel gave Dr. Avery an envelope.<\/p>\n
Avery sent it to Marianne.<\/p>\n
Marianne kept it sealed according to instructions.<\/p>\n
Why sealed?<\/p>\n
\u201cSo nobody could claim I altered it.\u201d<\/p>\n
Rachel thought ahead.<\/p>\n
\u201cShe knew identity records were contaminated.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cShe wanted chain of custody independent of medicine.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
That explained why Rachel selected Marianne.<\/p>\n
Not only because she was an attorney.<\/p>\n
Because Marianne understood the architecture.<\/p>\n
Lena asked, \u201cDid you know Stephen personally?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNot until six years ago.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat happened?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe came here.\u201d<\/p>\n
Lena sat straighter.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe knew who I was.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did he want?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cTo know whether I planned to reopen St. Agnes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did you tell him?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat if he ever contacted me again, I\u2019d report him.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid you?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cTo whom?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cFederal health fraud unit.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat happened?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNothing.\u201d<\/p>\n
That concerned Lena.<\/p>\n
\u201cNothing?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAn intake number. No follow-up.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid you preserve it?\u201d<\/p>\n
Marianne handed her a copy.<\/p>\n
The complaint had been routed to an investigator named Aaron Kell.<\/p>\n
Daniel searched remotely.<\/p>\n
Kell retired three years earlier.<\/p>\n
No known Lark connection.<\/p>\n
Then federal personnel records revealed something else.<\/p>\n
Kell\u2019s daughter received treatment at Harbor Biomedical during a severe illness.<\/p>\n
Bills waived.<\/p>\n
Another possible leverage relationship.<\/p>\n
The network\u2019s influence might have reached federal systems too.<\/p>\n
Lena felt old anger return.<\/p>\n
Not everyone was corrupt.<\/p>\n
That would be easier.<\/p>\n
Some were compromised.<\/p>\n
Some frightened.<\/p>\n
Some indebted.<\/p>\n
Some simply negligent.<\/p>\n
Lark survived through mixtures.<\/p>\n
\u201cDid Kell ever contact you privately?\u201d<\/p>\n
Marianne nodded.<\/p>\n
\u201cOnce.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did he say?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDrop it.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe said the people involved were too well insulated.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid he threaten you?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWarn you?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAbout Stephen?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe never used the name.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid he say anyone could get hurt?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe said my son\u2019s name.\u201d<\/p>\n
That was enough.<\/p>\n
Marianne stopped.<\/p>\n
Not permanently.<\/p>\n
Quietly.<\/p>\n
She kept records.<\/p>\n
Waited.<\/p>\n
Then Rachel arrived twenty years after Marianne nearly lost her child.<\/p>\n
A younger woman holding fragments of the same system.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did Rachel believe was most important?\u201d Lena asked.<\/p>\n
\u201cOlivia.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNot Rebecca?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cRebecca started her investigation.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThen why Olivia?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBecause Rachel said Michael was escalating.\u201d<\/p>\n
Marianne remembered Rachel saying something specific.<\/p>\n
\u201cHe\u2019s practicing on his daughter because she can\u2019t leave.\u201d<\/p>\n
Lena felt the sentence like a physical blow.<\/p>\n
That was how Rachel saw it.<\/p>\n
A patient could stop attending.<\/p>\n
An adult could refuse treatment.<\/p>\n
A child lived in the house.<\/p>\n
Olivia could not simply choose another doctor.<\/p>\n
\u201cDid Rachel say Stephen knew?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did she think?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cShe thought Stephen would eventually stop Michael to protect Lark.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWas she right?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cOperationally, maybe.\u201d<\/p>\n
Morally, no.<\/p>\n
Stephen warned Michael.<\/p>\n
Then covered him.<\/p>\n
Prepared trust money.<\/p>\n
Prepared separation plans.<\/p>\n
Everything except the one action that would have protected Olivia.<\/p>\n
Report him.<\/p>\n
Marianne looked toward the window.<\/p>\n
\u201cSystems like this survive because everybody waits for somebody more powerful to become responsible.\u201d<\/p>\n
Lena thought of Sarah.<\/p>\n
Margaret.<\/p>\n
David.<\/p>\n
Morris.<\/p>\n
Even herself, perhaps, if she were not careful.<\/p>\n
The criminal case was now transitioning.<\/p>\n
Evidence moved into grand jury proceedings.<\/p>\n
Victims received counsel.<\/p>\n
Identity corrections began.<\/p>\n
Federal agencies created a special team to review Lark\u2019s historical cases.<\/p>\n
But there was still one unresolved death at the center of current charges.<\/p>\n
Rachel.<\/p>\n
The medical examiner had completed final toxicology.<\/p>\n
Michael administered the first sedative.<\/p>\n
Stephen later administered a second compound at the cabin.<\/p>\n
That compound significantly suppressed respiration.<\/p>\n
Rachel died from combined central nervous system depression.<\/p>\n
Both administrations contributed.<\/p>\n
Manner:<\/p>\n
Homicide.<\/p>\n
Lena read the report with the prosecutor.<\/p>\n
\u201cCan we charge both?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDifferent theories?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cMichael\u2019s first dose created dangerous condition. Stephen\u2019s second materially contributed. Plus failure to obtain care.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat about intent?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cStephen\u2019s easier.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cMichael?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHarder.\u201d<\/p>\n
Michael claimed he intended sedation.<\/p>\n
Not death.<\/p>\n
His dosage was reckless.<\/p>\n
Then he helped move Rachel instead of seeking emergency care.<\/p>\n
Possible felony murder theories depended on charging structure.<\/p>\n
Manslaughter alternatives likely.<\/p>\n
Stephen\u2019s conduct after observing Rachel\u2019s condition looked more deliberate.<\/p>\n
Lena was less interested in labels than accuracy.<\/p>\n
Rachel deserved specifics.<\/p>\n
Sarah received the final report privately.<\/p>\n
She sat with it for a long time.<\/p>\n
\u201cSo I couldn\u2019t have saved her at the cabin?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou might have if emergency help came immediately. We can\u2019t know.\u201d<\/p>\n
Sarah\u2019s face tightened.<\/p>\n
\u201cI tried.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cMichael stopped me.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cStephen stopped everyone.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
Sarah looked down.<\/p>\n
\u201cFor months I thought I buried her.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou didn\u2019t.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI still left her there.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou were being held and manipulated.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI still left.\u201d<\/p>\n
Lena did not try to erase that sentence.<\/p>\n
Sarah was not asking to be absolved.<\/p>\n
She was trying to integrate reality.<\/p>\n
\u201cThat\u2019s something you\u2019ll have to live with,\u201d Lena said gently.<\/p>\n
Sarah nodded.<\/p>\n
\u201cGood.\u201d<\/p>\n
Lena raised an eyebrow.<\/p>\n
\u201cGood?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cIf everybody keeps telling me none of it belongs to me, then I never get to decide what does.\u201d<\/p>\n
That was wise.<\/p>\n
Sarah wanted responsibility that was hers.<\/p>\n
Not Stephen\u2019s manufactured guilt.<\/p>\n
Not Michael\u2019s narrative.<\/p>\n
Not false innocence either.<\/p>\n
Choice included choosing what grief to carry.<\/p>\n
Rachel\u2019s brother arrived from overseas for formal identification and memorial arrangements.<\/p>\n
He met Natalie.<\/p>\n
Their conversation remained private.<\/p>\n
Later Natalie told Sarah one thing.<\/p>\n
\u201cHe said Rachel always collected lost causes.\u201d<\/p>\n
Sarah smiled sadly.<\/p>\n
\u201cThat sounds like her.\u201d<\/p>\n
Natalie was improving physically.<\/p>\n
Psychologically, less predictably.<\/p>\n
She refused enclosed rooms.<\/p>\n
Requested every medication label before taking anything.<\/p>\n
Asked nurses to open sealed packages in front of her.<\/p>\n
No one called that difficult.<\/p>\n
Not anymore.<\/p>\n
Denise returned to work only in a limited consulting capacity.<\/p>\n
She declined immediate reinstatement to active child placement.<\/p>\n
\u201cI need to know whether I chose this career before I keep doing it.\u201d<\/p>\n
Her supervisor answered:<\/p>\n
\u201cYou did.\u201d<\/p>\n
Denise said, \u201cI need to know it myself.\u201d<\/p>\n
Fair.<\/p>\n
Caroline Webb met Patricia Nolan.<\/p>\n
Their reunion was quieter than Denise and Allison\u2019s.<\/p>\n
Patricia had kept a small knitted hat for twenty-four years.<\/p>\n
Caroline held it and said, \u201cI don\u2019t remember any of this.\u201d<\/p>\n
Patricia answered, \u201cYou shouldn\u2019t have to.\u201d<\/p>\n
No pressure to perform missing years.<\/p>\n
No expectation that biology would instantly create intimacy.<\/p>\n
They exchanged phone numbers.<\/p>\n
Started there.<\/p>\n
Meanwhile, investigators located Marianne\u2019s son and confirmed he wanted no direct involvement.<\/p>\n
His neonatal records still helped prove the attempted transfer.<\/p>\n
His identity remained sealed.<\/p>\n
Survivor testimony was not always necessary if documents could carry the burden.<\/p>\n
The government did not need to consume every victim to prove a crime.<\/p>\n
That mattered to Marianne.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou learned faster than they did,\u201d she told Lena.<\/p>\n
\u201cThey?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cInstitutions.\u201d<\/p>\n
Lena almost smiled.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe\u2019re trying.\u201d<\/p>\n
Then Daniel called.<\/p>\n
The last surviving portion of Stephen\u2019s mobile archive had been reconstructed.<\/p>\n
One folder was labeled CLOSURE.<\/p>\n
Inside were contingency letters.<\/p>\n
To Sarah.<\/p>\n
To Evan.<\/p>\n
To Denise.<\/p>\n
To Matthew.<\/p>\n
To Michael.<\/p>\n
To Stephen himself.<\/p>\n
Daniel opened the letter addressed to Sarah only after obtaining legal clearance and her consent.<\/p>\n
It was written eight years earlier.<\/p>\n
Before Olivia\u2019s abuse began.<\/p>\n
Before Sarah vanished.<\/p>\n
Stephen wrote:<\/p>\n
You will eventually learn about Evan.<\/p>\n
Sarah stopped.<\/p>\n
\u201cHow did he know?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe assumed secrets fail eventually.\u201d<\/p>\n
She continued.<\/p>\n
Stephen claimed he did not expect forgiveness.<\/p>\n
He described the original theft as an act he once rationalized as protecting Matthew and preserving the Mercer family.<\/p>\n
Then he wrote:<\/p>\n
The first lie required only one altered record. Keeping it true required a life.<\/p>\n
Sarah read that twice.<\/p>\n
A life.<\/p>\n
Evan\u2019s.<\/p>\n
Then hundreds more.<\/p>\n
Stephen understood the scaling effect.<\/p>\n
One false record became a structure requiring continuous maintenance.<\/p>\n
The letter ended:<\/p>\n
If I ever tell you I had no choice, do not believe me.<\/p>\n
Sarah laughed once.<\/p>\n
\u201cHe wrote that?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe knew too.\u201d<\/p>\n
Michael knew.<\/p>\n
Stephen knew.<\/p>\n
Matthew knew.<\/p>\n
Margaret knew.<\/p>\n
Again and again, the central tragedy was not ignorance.<\/p>\n
It was people recognizing the right choice and deciding its cost was too high.<\/p>\n
Sarah folded the letter.<\/p>\n
\u201cI\u2019m done reading men explaining themselves.\u201d<\/p>\n
She handed it back.<\/p>\n
\u201cArchive it.\u201d<\/p>\n
Lena nodded.<\/p>\n
As she left, Daniel met her with news from the grand jury.<\/p>\n
Indictments were beginning.<\/p>\n
Stephen Mercer.<\/p>\n
Michael Carter.<\/p>\n
Henry Morris.<\/p>\n
Janice Cole.<\/p>\n
Charles Vane.<\/p>\n
Harold Shaw.<\/p>\n
Leonard Pike.<\/p>\n
Richard Halden.<\/p>\n
Matthew Mercer.<\/p>\n
David Kessler\u2019s status remained under negotiation because his cooperation exposed major evidence, but he still faced obstruction-related counts.<\/p>\n
Margaret\u2019s role would be handled separately due to age, cooperation, and evidence of coercion.<\/p>\n
Laura Cole faced lesser charges tied to earlier archival work but was also a kidnapping victim and key witness.<\/p>\n
No tidy list of villains.<\/p>\n
No single ending.<\/p>\n
Then one name Lena expected did not appear.<\/p>\n
Michael.<\/p>\n
She looked again.<\/p>\n
He was there, but not for Rebecca\u2019s murder.<\/p>\n
Not yet.<\/p>\n
The prosecutor explained.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe need one more witness.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWho?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cMargaret gives us Stephen.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cPike gives us supply.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cMichael gives us knowledge.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBut nobody places Michael in the decision to use the cardiac drug.\u201d<\/p>\n
Lena understood.<\/p>\n
The conspiracy could reach him eventually.<\/p>\n
But charging murder required precision.<\/p>\n
Then Marianne called.<\/p>\n
\u201cI may have your witness.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWho?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cRebecca.\u201d<\/p>\n
Lena went still.<\/p>\n
\u201cRebecca\u2019s dead.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cShe recorded Stephen.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat?\u201d<\/p>\n
Marianne had just opened an old sealed packet Rachel delivered separately months before her death.<\/p>\n
Inside was a memory card.<\/p>\n
Rebecca Hale\u2019s voice.<\/p>\n
Recorded on her phone days before she died.<\/p>\n
Rebecca said:<\/p>\n
If anything happens to me, Michael knows Stephen asked him what would stop my heart.<\/p>\n
Lena felt the case shift.<\/p>\n
Then Rebecca\u2019s voice continued.<\/p>\n
And Michael told him.<\/p>\n
Marianne Holt did not deny it when Lena arrived. The former federal prosecutor stood behind her office desk with both hands resting on the wood. \u201cYou found the hospital report.\u201d … <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":13324,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-13358","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-feel-one-story"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/feelonestory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13358","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/feelonestory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/feelonestory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/feelonestory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/feelonestory.online\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=13358"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/feelonestory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13358\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":13398,"href":"https:\/\/feelonestory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13358\/revisions\/13398"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/feelonestory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/13324"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/feelonestory.online\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=13358"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/feelonestory.online\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=13358"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/feelonestory.online\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=13358"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}