Dr. Martin Keene hired criminal counsel.<\/p>\n
That happened before investigators executed the search warrant on Greybridge Care Consulting.<\/p>\n
It did not make him guilty.<\/p>\n
It made him sensible.<\/p>\n
People with expensive exposure tend to become sensible very quickly.<\/p>\n
The search produced three computers, two phones, billing records, and seventeen elder-capacity case files.<\/p>\n
Mine was not the only one.<\/p>\n
That troubled Ortiz.<\/p>\n
It troubled me more.<\/p>\n
\u201cSeventeen?\u201d I asked.<\/p>\n
\u201cActive and recent.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHow many involved Curtis?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cToo early.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHow many involve guardianship?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cMost.\u201d<\/p>\n
Miriam leaned forward.<\/p>\n
\u201cSame pattern?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cUnknown.\u201d<\/p>\n
I hated that word more every day.<\/p>\n
Unknown.<\/p>\n
Not because uncertainty was wrong.<\/p>\n
Because it meant somewhere another family might be inside a version of my story without knowing it yet.<\/p>\n
\u201cWas Keene licensed?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cIn good standing?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cCurrently.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAny disciplinary history?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cOne complaint five years ago. Dismissed.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cFor?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cProviding an opinion without personally examining the subject.\u201d<\/p>\n
Of course.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did he say?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat he performed records review only and made that limitation clear.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid he make it clear in my case?\u201d<\/p>\n
Ortiz looked at me.<\/p>\n
\u201cNot enough.\u201d<\/p>\n
Keene\u2019s draft report described me as presenting \u201cprobable major neurocognitive impairment requiring urgent protective supervision.\u201d<\/p>\n
That language sounded like a diagnosis.<\/p>\n
Yet he had never spoken to me.<\/p>\n
Never tested me.<\/p>\n
Never watched me walk into a room.<\/p>\n
He had read Daniel\u2019s lies.<\/p>\n
Curtis\u2019s fabricated record.<\/p>\n
Vanessa\u2019s notes.<\/p>\n
Then wrote something designed to sound authoritative.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat was he paid?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cTwenty-five thousand across three Greybridge transfers.\u201d<\/p>\n
My eyebrows lifted.<\/p>\n
\u201cFor one records review?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cGreybridge billed broader consultation.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat broader consultation?\u201d<\/p>\n
That answer came from the seized files.<\/p>\n
Facility selection.<\/p>\n
Guardianship transition planning.<\/p>\n
Behavioral management.<\/p>\n
Post-placement documentation.<\/p>\n
The last category chilled me.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat is post-placement documentation?\u201d<\/p>\n
Ortiz opened a Greybridge template.<\/p>\n
It instructed facility staff to track:<\/p>\n
Resistance to medication.<\/p>\n
Attempts to contact outsiders.<\/p>\n
Complaints of financial exploitation.<\/p>\n
Demands to leave.<\/p>\n
Assertions that family members were conspiring.<\/p>\n
Each could be coded as a behavioral symptom.<\/p>\n
I stared at the sheet.<\/p>\n
\u201cThey planned to document my resistance after they caused it.\u201d<\/p>\n
Miriam\u2019s expression hardened.<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cIf I refused medication, symptom.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cIf I asked for a lawyer, symptom.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cPotentially.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cIf I said Daniel stole from me, symptom.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
The system was built to convert every rational response into confirmation of the premise.<\/p>\n
\u201cHow do you prove competence once everything you do is interpreted as illness?\u201d<\/p>\n
Miriam answered quietly.<\/p>\n
\u201cIndependent access.\u201d<\/p>\n
Which they planned to prevent.<\/p>\n
Exactly.<\/p>\n
Ortiz showed us emails between Curtis and Keene.<\/p>\n
One from six weeks before the hearing:<\/p>\n
Need framework robust enough to survive patient denial and family interference.<\/p>\n
Keene responded:<\/p>\n
Cannot opine beyond supplied data. Recommend formal testing after temporary authority.<\/p>\n
Curtis:<\/p>\n
Testing can happen once placement stabilizes.<\/p>\n
My hands tightened.<\/p>\n
The goal was temporary authority first.<\/p>\n
Evidence later.<\/p>\n
Once authority existed, Daniel or Keene could shape the environment surrounding the later evaluation.<\/p>\n
Another exchange:<\/p>\n
CH: Need to anticipate Feld.<\/p>\n
MK: Who?<\/p>\n
CH: Family lawyer. Aggressive.<\/p>\n
MK: Limit legal contact?<\/p>\n
CH: Guardian can manage if clinically justified.<\/p>\n
Keene replied:<\/p>\n
That is legal, not medical.<\/p>\n
That line mattered.<\/p>\n
He resisted.<\/p>\n
A little.<\/p>\n
Then another email three days later.<\/p>\n
MK: If patient becomes agitated after adversarial contact, facility may reasonably limit stimulation.<\/p>\n
Curtis:<\/p>\n
Good. Put that in transition plan.<\/p>\n
Keene had not simply been duped.<\/p>\n
He understood how his language could be used.<\/p>\n
Whether he understood the full fraud was another question.<\/p>\n
Ortiz said he was now cooperating partially.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat does partially mean?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe admits concerns about the source material.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhen?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBefore court.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid he tell Curtis?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat concerns?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThe treating-physician note lacked normal identifiers.\u201d<\/p>\n
The forged record.<\/p>\n
\u201cHe suspected it was fake?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe says he suspected it was incomplete.\u201d<\/p>\n
Convenient distinction.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did he do?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAsked Curtis for verification.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAnd?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cCurtis said original office metadata had been lost during export.\u201d<\/p>\n
I laughed.<\/p>\n
\u201cDid Keene accept that?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe says he accepted counsel\u2019s representation.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBecause Curtis was the retaining attorney.\u201d<\/p>\n
Miriam looked disgusted.<\/p>\n
\u201cA physician outsourcing factual verification to the lawyer who benefits from the opinion.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid he ask Daniel?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cVanessa?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cMe?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
So he had not wanted uncertainty resolved badly enough to risk losing the assignment.<\/p>\n
Another form of convenience.<\/p>\n
Ortiz opened Keene\u2019s notes from a phone call with Curtis.<\/p>\n
Patient highly intelligent, likely to mask deficits.<\/p>\n
I almost smiled.<\/p>\n
Of course.<\/p>\n
If I performed well, that could become masking.<\/p>\n
If I performed poorly, impairment.<\/p>\n
No possible result contradicted the theory.<\/p>\n
\u201cThat is circular.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid Keene write that?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo. Curtis said it.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cKeene\u2019s response?\u201d<\/p>\n
Only:<\/p>\n
Understood.<\/p>\n
One word.<\/p>\n
Enough to keep going.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat about replacement guardianship?\u201d<\/p>\n
Ortiz opened another email.<\/p>\n
Subject:<\/p>\n
Alternate pathway.<\/p>\n
Curtis wrote:<\/p>\n
If family guardian compromised by financial allegations, professional option needed immediately to preserve placement and asset continuity.<\/p>\n
Keene:<\/p>\n
I do not serve as financial guardian.<\/p>\n
Curtis:<\/p>\n
Temporary personal guardian only. Fiduciary can handle accounts.<\/p>\n
There it was.<\/p>\n
Keene had not agreed yet.<\/p>\n
But he had entertained it.<\/p>\n
\u201cWho was the fiduciary?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAn entity called North Star Fiduciary Services.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAnother shell?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cReal company.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cConnection to Curtis?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cTwo prior referrals.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cLegitimate?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cPossibly.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid North Star know about me?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
My stomach tightened.<\/p>\n
They had received a preliminary packet.<\/p>\n
Not the fake physician note.<\/p>\n
But the same behavioral summary.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did they say?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThey declined.\u201d<\/p>\n
That surprised me.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cConflict concerns. Their intake attorney noted the proposed guardian\u2019s financial interests appeared adverse.\u201d<\/p>\n
Someone had read carefully.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat happened?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cCurtis never told Daniel.\u201d<\/p>\n
Of course.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did he do instead?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDrafted a new fiduciary proposal using another firm.\u201d<\/p>\n
Which one?<\/p>\n
A company named Guardian Equity Partners.<\/p>\n
The name alone made me distrust it.<\/p>\n
\u201cReal?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHistory?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cVery new. Two years.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cOwner?\u201d<\/p>\n
Ortiz paused.<\/p>\n
\u201cFranklin Saye\u2019s sister.\u201d<\/p>\n
I laughed without humor.<\/p>\n
There it was.<\/p>\n
Another old network connection.<\/p>\n
Everything stayed close enough to manage.<\/p>\n
Curtis had a broker.<\/p>\n
Investigator.<\/p>\n
Doctor.<\/p>\n
Potential fiduciary.<\/p>\n
Shell entities.<\/p>\n
All connected through money or family.<\/p>\n
Not one grand conspiracy.<\/p>\n
A set of people willing to perform narrow tasks without asking what the whole looked like.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did Guardian Equity receive?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cA proposed fee schedule.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cFrom my assets.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHow much?\u201d<\/p>\n
Miriam read.<\/p>\n
Monthly fiduciary fee.<\/p>\n
Property-management fee.<\/p>\n
Sale transaction fee.<\/p>\n
Administrative fee.<\/p>\n
If the house sold at 1.15 million, Guardian Equity would receive nearly thirty thousand in combined compensation.<\/p>\n
Curtis\u2019s affiliated entities received more.<\/p>\n
Franklin earned commission.<\/p>\n
Keene earned consulting.<\/p>\n
Ashford gained equity.<\/p>\n
Everyone got paid from my loss.<\/p>\n
My mental incapacity was a business model.<\/p>\n
I looked at Ortiz.<\/p>\n
\u201cDid anyone in this system have a financial incentive for me to remain competent?\u201d<\/p>\n
She did not answer.<\/p>\n
She did not need to.<\/p>\n
Miriam said, \u201cThat question may matter later.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cIt matters now.\u201d<\/p>\n
The investigation widened.<\/p>\n
Keene\u2019s other cases were reviewed.<\/p>\n
Not all involved Curtis.<\/p>\n
Some looked routine.<\/p>\n
Several did not.<\/p>\n
One contained nearly identical language:<\/p>\n
Patient likely to deny impairment due to high premorbid intelligence.<\/p>\n
Another:<\/p>\n
Resistance to placement may itself demonstrate impaired judgment.<\/p>\n
I stared.<\/p>\n
\u201cTemplates.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHow many?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAt least six.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSame facilities?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThree overlap.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cCedar Glen?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cTwice.\u201d<\/p>\n
The story was bigger than me.<\/p>\n
Not necessarily criminal in every case.<\/p>\n
But the pattern was disturbing enough that regulators were notified.<\/p>\n
I should have felt vindicated.<\/p>\n
Instead I thought of strangers in rooms saying they were fine while paperwork insisted they were not.<\/p>\n
Ortiz said, \u201cDo not assume all six were wrongful.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI\u2019m not.\u201d<\/p>\n
But I knew how systems hide abuse.<\/p>\n
By placing it beside legitimate cases.<\/p>\n
Keene\u2019s counsel arranged an interview.<\/p>\n
He admitted Curtis had approached him months earlier about \u201ca difficult elder-capacity matter.\u201d<\/p>\n
Before any formal petition.<\/p>\n
Before supposed decline.<\/p>\n
Keene said Curtis described a widow with grief-related deterioration.<\/p>\n
Me.<\/p>\n
He was given an initial retainer before receiving records.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did he think he was being paid to do?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAssess whether guardianship was clinically supportable.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBefore evidence?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid he understand the desired answer?\u201d<\/p>\n
Ortiz looked at me.<\/p>\n
\u201cHe says no.\u201d<\/p>\n
I gave her a look.<\/p>\n
She almost smiled.<\/p>\n
Keene also admitted Curtis asked how quickly behavior could deteriorate after bereavement.<\/p>\n
Keene provided literature.<\/p>\n
Curtis then began using those phrases in drafts.<\/p>\n
Grief-related executive decline.<\/p>\n
Paranoid fixation.<\/p>\n
Impaired insight.<\/p>\n
Medical language became construction material.<\/p>\n
Curtis did not need a doctor willing to invent everything.<\/p>\n
He needed a doctor willing to supply vocabulary.<\/p>\n
Then he built the narrative himself.<\/p>\n
That distinction may save Keene from the worst charges.<\/p>\n
It did not impress me.<\/p>\n
Later that afternoon, Daniel called.<\/p>\n
Not through Rebecca.<\/p>\n
Directly.<\/p>\n
I stared at his name.<\/p>\n
Miriam was with me.<\/p>\n
\u201cDo you want me to answer?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
I answered.<\/p>\n
\u201cMom.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat?\u201d<\/p>\n
His voice sounded strained.<\/p>\n
\u201cOrtiz told me about Keene.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cShe should not have told you details.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cShe told Rebecca enough.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat do you want?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI didn\u2019t know Curtis had a replacement.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI believe that.\u201d<\/p>\n
Silence.<\/p>\n
The fact I believed him seemed to hurt.<\/p>\n
\u201cI thought if the hearing went bad, it was over.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe told me if we lost, we\u2019d regroup.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou were the thing he planned to discard.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI know.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou helped him build that power.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI know.\u201d<\/p>\n
I was tired of hearing it.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat do you want, Daniel?\u201d<\/p>\n
He hesitated.<\/p>\n
\u201cThere\u2019s someone else.\u201d<\/p>\n
My attention sharpened.<\/p>\n
\u201cWho?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI never met him.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThen how do you know?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cCurtis called him Archer.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cFirst name?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI don\u2019t know.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cRole?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe handled placements.\u201d<\/p>\n
Miriam began writing.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat does that mean?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cCurtis said Archer knew how to move people fast after orders.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cCedar Glen?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cMaybe.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWas he at Hale Property?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHow were they connected?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI heard Curtis say Archer could \u2018quiet resistance.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n
My skin went cold.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat does that mean?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI don\u2019t know.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDaniel.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI swear.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDo not swear to me.\u201d<\/p>\n
He stopped.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhen did you hear this?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cTwo weeks before court.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cContext?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI told Curtis I didn\u2019t want you drugged.\u201d<\/p>\n
My hand tightened around the phone.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou discussed that possibility.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe brought it up.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAnd you remained.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat exactly did he say?\u201d<\/p>\n
Daniel took a breath.<\/p>\n
\u201cIf she fights placement, Archer knows how facilities handle it.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThen?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI said no sedation.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAnd Curtis?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe laughed.\u201d<\/p>\n
My stomach turned.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did he say?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat I watched too many movies. He said there were cleaner ways to manage agitation.\u201d<\/p>\n
Miriam\u2019s face hardened.<\/p>\n
\u201cSuch as?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI don\u2019t know.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid you ask?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
Of course.<\/p>\n
He never asked questions once answers might make participation impossible.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat else?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cCurtis said once you were in, everything would get easier.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cFor whom?\u201d<\/p>\n
Daniel started crying.<\/p>\n
\u201cFor us.\u201d<\/p>\n
There it was.<\/p>\n
Still.<\/p>\n
Even then.<\/p>\n
\u201cGive Ortiz every reference to Archer.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI will.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDo not call me again unless there is something investigators need immediately.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cMom\u2014\u201d<\/p>\n
I ended the call.<\/p>\n
Miriam looked at me.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou okay?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
We gave Ortiz the name.<\/p>\n
Archer.<\/p>\n
She began searching connections.<\/p>\n
Cedar Glen staff.<\/p>\n
Hale Property vendors.<\/p>\n
Greybridge referrals.<\/p>\n
Guardian Equity.<\/p>\n
The answer came late that evening.<\/p>\n
Not a first name.<\/p>\n
A company.<\/p>\n
Archer Patient Transport.<\/p>\n
Private medical transport service.<\/p>\n
Licensed.<\/p>\n
Real.<\/p>\n
Three vehicles.<\/p>\n
Contracts with care facilities.<\/p>\n
Including Cedar Glen.<\/p>\n
Owner:<\/p>\n
Caleb Dorne.<\/p>\n
I stared at the record.<\/p>\n
The private investigator had another business.<\/p>\n
Surveillance on one side.<\/p>\n
Patient transport on the other.<\/p>\n
Curtis had not only arranged someone to watch me before the hearing.<\/p>\n
He had arranged the same man to transport me away after it.<\/p>\n
The man who followed me to the motel was supposed to be the man who drove me to Cedar Glen.<\/p>\n
That was not coincidence.<\/p>\n
That was continuity.<\/p>\n
And on Caleb\u2019s recovered external drive, investigators found a prefilled transport authorization.<\/p>\n
Patient:<\/p>\n
Eleanor Vance.<\/p>\n
Pickup location:<\/p>\n
County courthouse.<\/p>\n
Destination:<\/p>\n
Cedar Glen Memory and Behavioral Care.<\/p>\n
Pickup time:<\/p>\n
1:30 p.m.<\/p>\n
The day of my hearing.<\/p>\n
I looked at the timestamp.<\/p>\n
At 1:30 p.m., while Daniel and Vanessa still believed they were winning, a vehicle had been scheduled to take me directly from court to a facility ninety miles away.<\/p>\n
They had never planned to let me go home.<\/p>\n
Dr. Martin Keene hired criminal counsel. That happened before investigators executed the search warrant on Greybridge Care Consulting. It did not make him guilty. It made him sensible. People with … <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":14274,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-14312","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-feel-one-story"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/feelonestory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14312","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/feelonestory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/feelonestory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/feelonestory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/feelonestory.online\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=14312"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/feelonestory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14312\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":14390,"href":"https:\/\/feelonestory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14312\/revisions\/14390"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/feelonestory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/14274"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/feelonestory.online\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=14312"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/feelonestory.online\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=14312"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/feelonestory.online\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=14312"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}